Lately, AI companies have been aggressively courting newspapers and media organizations. They’re trying to normalize the use of AI tools in news-curation and content creation.
However, these efforts haven’t been without their setbacks. For example, CNET had to issue several corrections after publishing an article written by a machine.
What is the New York Times article about
Amid the excitement about artificial intelligence, many in the industry are still worried about its risks. One of those concerns is that AI could be used to create news stories, a practice known as “generative text.” This technology can produce false or misleading information, and it can also be difficult to tell whether a piece of writing was produced by a human or by an algorithm.
In response to this concern, some media outlets have taken steps to limit the use of generative text in their content. The New York Times, for example, updated its terms of service in August to forbid the use of its content in the training of generative text algorithms. The move comes amid a growing cold war between news publishers and technology companies over the use of their content in AI.
In a sign of the tension, Semafor reported this week that the Times has pulled out of a group led by IAC’s Barry Diller to negotiate with tech companies over the use of their content in AI. The move is a blow to Diller’s efforts, and it may make the group less effective at negotiating with tech companies. It also increases the likelihood that the Times will strike separate agreements with generative AI providers. The AP, for instance, recently struck a deal with ChatGPT-owner OpenAI to use its archived news articles in AI training.
Who wrote the Google AI article
Google is testing an artificial intelligence tool that can write news articles, according to the New York Times. The product, called Genesis, gathers information like details about current events and then generates news content. The company is pitching the product to news outlets including the Times and The Washington Post, as well as News Corp, which owns the Wall Street Journal. Some executives who saw the pitch found it unsettling, but Google says the AI can’t replace journalists.
Experts are concerned about how the tools could be used to spread misinformation and undermine public trust in news. They also worry about the security risks of using them to produce sensitive news. They say the technology could reveal confidential sources and even potentially expose the identity of people who provide reporters with information.
The experts are calling for more regulation of AI, especially as it becomes more entwined with the news. They want to see companies disclose how they use their products and take steps to prevent malicious uses. They also want to see more efforts to improve the quality of AI and ensure that it is safe for humans to interact with.
Many publishers are also angry at the way in which AI firms have been scooping up decades of their content to train their algorithms without compensating them. They are pushing for licensing agreements that would compensate them for their work.
When was the New York Times article published
Amid all the hype about artificial intelligence, there is a growing concern that it could be used to spread misinformation. In a world where people are already wondering what is real and what is fake, the proliferation of AI tools could lead to even more confusion. The New York Times has taken steps to address this issue by updating its terms of service to explicitly prohibit the use of its content in generative AI models. The move will prevent large language models from using data scraped from the internet, which could be harmful to the newspaper’s reputation.
The New York Times update is a response to recent incidents in which generative AI has been used to publish incorrect information. Some examples of this include a fake legal decision that disrupted a court case and a sham scientific paper on the James Webb Space Telescope. These incidents have raised concerns among media organizations that generative AI can spread misleading information and affect how traditionally written stories are perceived.
While some journalists have expressed optimism about the technology, others have voiced concerns that it will undermine their work. One fear is that generative AI will replace the role of fact-checkers, which is essential to maintaining credibility.
The New York Times’ move could have significant implications for the generative AI industry. It could slow the development of AI tools like ChatGPT, which use data scraped from the open web. It could also impact the ability of Big Tech companies to access the content they need for their models.
Where can I find the Google AI article
Google has been aggressively courting legacy news organizations to sell them on a new AI tool, according to the New York Times. The company is testing a new product called Genesis that can write news articles based on current events. It is being pitched to companies like the Times and the Washington Post, as well as News Corp, which owns The Wall Street Journal. While many executives were unsettled by the pitch, the company argues that it can help journalists with their research and writing.
However, some news outlets have been concerned that the technology could cause them to lose jobs and lower reader engagement. They also worry that the tools could spread misinformation or create biased content. In addition, they worry that they will be unable to differentiate between content created by humans and machines.
The Times recently updated its terms of use to prohibit the use of its content in the training of generative AI models. This move is part of a larger battle between news publishers and technology giants over the ownership of data. Generative AI models require large amounts of text data to train, and they are often harvested from the open web using scraping tools. This has raised concerns over copyright law and the ownership of content.
Last month, the Associated Press struck a deal with ChatGPT-maker OpenAI to license AP archives for two years in order to use them to train its generative AI model. But the Times has decided not to join a group of media companies that are planning to collectively negotiate with tech giants over AI policies.
What are the key points of the New York Times article
Amid the excitement over AI, concerns about its effects on jobs and society are rising. Some people fear that AI will replace humans in many areas, while others believe that it can help them perform tasks more efficiently. However, it is important to remember that these changes will not happen overnight. It will take time for AI to replace existing jobs and create new ones. This will require companies to invest in training programs and give employees the skills they need to succeed.
Some experts argue that these fears are exaggerated, but others say they are legitimate. They warn that bad actors could use AI to commit crimes, such as fraud or murder. They also worry that it could lead to a loss of privacy and freedom. Other experts point to the history of technological change, saying that it has always led to a period of adjustment.
Moreover, some experts are concerned that the government will regulate AI too quickly. They believe that this will cause the industry to become less innovative and slow down growth. Others point to the success of China’s AI policy as a model for how the US can regulate the industry.
In addition, some news organizations are worried that their content is being used to train AI without permission. They are asking lawmakers to craft laws that require copyrighted material to be licensed before it can be used to train AI. They are also demanding greater transparency with public datasets.
Can I trust the information in the Google AI article
With companies investing billions in AI, universities making it a prominent part of their curricula, and the U.S. Department of Defense getting more involved in the field, it’s a safe bet that the technology is here to stay. But with such massive growth also comes risks, particularly in areas like privacy and security.
The New York Times and its publishers have a long history of negotiating with tech companies to protect their content, but this latest tussle may be the spiciest yet. NPR reports that the two sides have gotten to the point where they’re threatening a lawsuit. The Times has now explicitly prohibited AI companies from processing its content in its terms of service, while OpenAI disabled ChatGPT’s browsing feature, which allows users to peek behind paywalls.
As generative AI writing tools, such as ChatGPT, enter the marketplace, news organizations are increasingly concerned about their ability to compete with the machines for the attention of readers. But despite these fears, the use of AI in journalism isn’t without its benefits.
Rather than replacing journalists, these new tools can be used to help them produce more content and improve their productivity. They can also be used to help identify and respond to reader questions in real time, as well as automate repetitive tasks. Ultimately, they can give journalists more time to do what they do best: write news stories.